COURSE:

NURS 6050 – Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population


GLOBAL HEALTHCARE COMPARISON MATRIX AND NARRATIVE STATEMENT

If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?

You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.

Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve.

In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country.

To Prepare:

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)

Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix

Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:

Part 2: A Plan for Social Change

Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.

In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

 

 SOLUTION

Global Health Comparison Grid Template

Use this document to complete the Module 6 Assessment Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement

Global Healthcare Issue COVID-19 Pandemic
Description During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, different countries led by the United States took stringent measures to contain the proliferation of the virus. There was the banning of public gatherings and restriction of religious institutions. Senator Lee Mike introduced S. Amdt. 1425 in Congress as a way of explaining the rationale for limiting religious institutions, whereas a majority of commercial centers still run. In the neighboring country of Mexico, non-essential meetings were banned and even conventions in private enterprises were halted on account of public interest. The report on religious restrictions over the COVID-19 pandemic outlines the limitations imposed on freedom of worship as a containment measure to prevent further spreading of the coronavirus disease.

 

 

Country United States

 

Mexico
Describe the policy in each country related to the identified healthcare issue In response to a rapid increment in the COVID-19 infection rates, the federal government banned all physical religious meetings. The main reason for this decision was to cut down on the spreading of the virus by avoiding people’s physical contact.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mexican lawmakers all settled on instituting stringent healthcare regulations enforcement in a bid to flatten the curve. On top of banning physical religious meetings, they also limited private spaces and streets with the aim of curbing the spread of the disease (“The Associated Press,” 2020).

………………………………..$10

error: ScholarlyAcademia.com !!
×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

× How can I help you?