Task 1
1. Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of arbitration as a mechanism for resolving international commercial disputes. Consider factors such as flexibility, neutrality, enforceability, and procedural fairness.
2. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of alternative dispute resolution procedures, including litigation, mediation, and negotiation, in the context of international business transactions.
3. Examine different types of arbitration agreements, such as ad hoc and institutional arbitration, and assess their suitability for specific commercial agreements.
4. Apply the requirements of a valid arbitration agreement to hypothetical scenarios reflecting various business agreements and industries.
Task 2
1. Conduct a detailed analysis of the roles and powers of prominent arbitral institutions, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR).
2. Compare and contrast the competition between different arbitral institutions, considering factors such as reputation, efficiency, and procedural rules.
3. Analyze the role of the lex arbitri in international commercial arbitration and its implications for the arbitration process.
4. Identify and discuss the relevant laws and legal frameworks governing the establishment and operation of arbitral institutions.
5. Evaluate the impact of different arbitral seats on the arbitration process, including considerations of procedural rules, legal infrastructure, and judicial intervention.
6. Critically evaluate the appointment procedures and powers of arbitrators within the context of arbitral institutions, considering issues of impartiality, independence, and competence.
Task 3
1. Analyze the provisions of the UNCITRAL model law and arbitration rules related to provisional measures, considering their scope, applicability, and procedural requirements.
2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the UNCITRAL model law and arbitration rules in providing for provisional measures, considering factors such as flexibility, enforceability, and practical implementation.
3. Critically assess the success of the New York Convention 1958 in promoting the enforceability of arbitral awards on an international scale, examining its key provisions and implications for arbitration practice.
4. Explore case studies or examples that demonstrate the application and impact of provisional measures in international arbitration, highlighting both successful
and challenging scenarios.
5. Consider practical challenges and potential areas for improvement in the legal frameworks governing provisional measures and the enforcement of arbitral awards……………………………………………….$15